Publications

Abstract

This article illustrates one of several learning sequences from the Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science (IMS) Learning project, connecting science and mathematics learning in the primary school. Investigating Body Height involved a series of investigations conducted in Grades 5 and 6 across six classes in one school. The project teachers implemented an enquiry-based pedagogical model to collect, organise, analyse and represent data about students’ heights. Statistical ideas and various forms of graphical representation were developed well beyond curriculum expectations.

Download pre-print copy of the publication

Cite

Introduction

Many of the activities involving changes to matter relate to common phenomena, but challenge students to look at them in new ways. In this article we start with activities on dissolving and mixing, highlighting the important distinction, but with both phenomena representing a physical change. We follow with some chemical change activities which also involve ‘mixing’ of substances but in these cases, new materials are formed, with different properties. The formation of a gas in an acid-base reaction is an example of this or burning which involves a reaction between oxygen and a substance to form, for instance, carbon in the case of organic material, and carbon dioxide. Distinguishing between physical and chemical changes is not always easy, particularly if you do not have access to the concept of atoms and molecules. You can get several surprising effects from chemical reactions. In the early and middle school years, only simple reactions are appropriate, such as that between sodium bicarbonate (baking powder) and vinegar (or any mild acid) to produce carbon dioxide. This reaction is the basis for many intriguing activities, with effects that depend on the gas production. Cooking provides some excellent examples of both physical and chemical change and is a useful and popular activity in classrooms. In the ‘kitchen science’ section of this topic you can focus on techniques for observing and understanding the changes that occur in cooking and use some novel recording strategies.

Download pre-print copy of the publication

Cite

Introduction

The teaching and learning sequence Investigating Light is the focus of this article and was conducted in Grade 5/6 as partof the Australian Research Council (ARC) funded Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science (IMS) Learning Project (Tytler,et al.  2018-2021). This sequence is aligned to the Victorian Science curriculum. In response to the challenge of providing authentic, accessible, and engaging science learning experiences for students during remote learning, this iteration of the Investigating Light sequence was developed in consultation with teachers, toensure student accessibility in the online learning context. Relatable to students, the activities were adapted from the Deakin University Ideas for Teaching Science P-8 (https://blogs.deakin.edu.au/sci-enviro-ed/early-years/). Reflecting an interdisciplinary focus, this sequence included opportunities for students to investigate with both science and maths in engaging and complimentary ways (See table 1.). For instance, students are challenged to explore angles, rotation and light directionality in their periscope designs, and the relationship between shadow size and the distance from the light source, when investigating shadow puppets in the ‘Shadow Play Investigation’ lesson.

Download pre-print copy of the publication

Cite

Download pre-print copy of the publication

Cite

New pedagogies for interdisciplinary STEM

Russell Tytler of Deakin University sheds light on the direct teaching versus inquiry debate in the Science and Mathematics space.

“Current advocacy of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) represents a reform movement to increase engagement of students with the STEM disciplines, and to develop STEM skills that will prepare students for life in the 21st century. Such skills overlap with generic competencies that are increasingly represented in global curriculum framing (OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018), such as complex and creative problem solving, critical thinking, design thinking, mathematical reasoning, interpersonal and collaborative skills, and trans-disciplinarity.”

Read the full article at Education Matters.

Cite

Abstract

Growing research evidence indicates student learning gains from guided representation construction/invention in school science and mathematics. In this inquiry approach, students address challenges around what features of a phenomenon/problem to attend to, what data to collect, how and why, and make collective judgments about multimodal accounts of phenomena. However, researchers to date have tended to focus on student learning rather than on the teacher’s role in guiding various phases of inquiry. In this paper we report on: a) analysis of Grade 1 students’ engagement in interdisciplinary mathematics and science inquiry practices in a classroom sequence in ecology; b) the teacher’s role in guiding such inquiry; and c) interpretation of these practices in terms of support of student transduction (connecting and remaking meanings across representations in different modes). Data from our study included video capture of two case-study teachers’ guidance of tasks and classroom discussion, and student artefacts. We examine the classroom processes through which the teachers used students’ invention and revision of data displays to teach the concepts of living things, diversity, distribution and adaptive features related to habitat in science. Mathematical processes included constructing and interpreting mapping, measurement and data modelling, sampling, and using a scale. The analysis offers fresh insights into how teachers support student learning in these two subjects, through discrete stages of orienting, representation challenge, building consensus, and applying and extending representational systems.

Cite

Publisher / DOI

While astronomy is commonly taught in primary schools, there is abundant evidence of the persistence of misconceptions of astronomical phenomena. A core difficulty for students is the need to coordinate earth and space-centred perspectives in visualising and explaining astronomical phenomena. This chapter will describe an astronomy lesson sequence with 150 students from six Grade 1 (age 6 years) classes across two schools. The sequence links science with mathematics, with representation construction and modeling as core approaches to learning. Key features of the sequence were students’ construction and coordination of spatial representations. These were connected with the changes/movements in shadows (patterns) throughout the day and with the movement of the sun in the sky and with earth’s rotation in relation to the sun to explain day and night. The mathematics focus was on spatial reasoning including representations of length, rotation and angle, pattern representation, and temporal reasoning. Pre- and post-test data and student interviews showed considerable shifts in understanding of day and night and earth-sun relations. Analysis of the video data, and field notes, showed the complexity of concepts and spatial reasoning required, as well as the power of an interdisciplinary, guided inquiry pedagogy involving the construction, comparison and evaluation of concepts and representations.

Download pre-print copy of the publication

Cite

Publisher / DOI

Abstract

Against a backdrop of advocacy for but concerns about interdisciplinary STEM curricula, this paper explores the design principles underpinning a three-year longitudinal research project that develops and evaluates interdisciplinary mathematics and science learning sequences, involving more than 30 teachers and 300+ students in cohorts across the primary school years. The research uses design-based methodology and deploys a pedagogical cycle (orienting, posing representational challenges, evaluating and building consensus, applying and extending representations) based on representation construction and model-based reasoning, reflecting core disciplinary processes, and aimed at foundational concepts. The interdisciplinary structure of sequences in different topics, teacher pedagogy, and student reasoning and learning are illustrated through three learning sequence vignettes, drawing on micro-ethnographic video analysis of classroom activity, student interviews and pre-and post-tests. In these topics both mathematical learning (measure, data modeling and spatial reasoning) and science learning (astronomy, ecology and flight concepts, and practices), were reinforced and enriched through the interdisciplinary framing. Drawing on field notes and recordings of teacher planning and review meetings for these sequences, coupled with the classroom data, we identify a) the design features through which mathematics and science can productively interact, b) the challenges in working with teachers to achieve interdisciplinary alignment, and c) the key pedagogical features that emerged to support this integration. We identify design challenges associated with curriculum alignment, teacher expectations and epistemological orientations to learning in mathematics. The research contributes to conceptualising how interdisciplinary processes in mathematics and science teaching and learning can be effectively framed and enacted at scale.

Cite

Publisher / DOI

Linking Mathematics and Science Productively

2021 Conference

Russell Tytler¹, Peta White¹, Melinda Kirk¹, Joanne Mulligan^2
1Deakin University, ²Macquarie University

The Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science (IMS) project has developed, trialed and refined learning sequences across years 1-6 that productively link mathematics with science in ways that enhance fundamental learning in each subject. The principles of this interdisciplinary linking include: there is fresh learning of foundational constructs in both subjects; each subject enhances learning in the other; and attention is given to progression of knowledge and skills. A central feature of the sequence design is attention to authentic disciplinary epistemic practices through students inventing, evaluating and refining representations. We will draw on a Grade 2 sequence in paper helicopter flight that involves mathematical constructs of measure, variation, and data modeling, to a). illustrate the interdisciplinary design principles and how they operate to enhance learning, and b). explore the challenges for teachers in implementing such interdisciplinary learning. These challenges relate to: teacher pedagogy, epistemology, and knowledge; the need to flexibly interpret and anticipate curriculum progression; and the lack of support in traditional mathematics curriculum practice for this epistemic vision. We will explore the variation in ways in which the mathematics and science interrelate in the different sequences.​

Download pre-print copy of the publication

https://www.mathunion.org/icmi/conferences/icme/icme-14-2021

https://www.mathunion.org/icmi/conferences/icme-international-congress-mathematical-education

Accepted presentation and paper

Young students learning the mathematics of measurement through an interdisciplinary approach

Peta White¹, Russell Tytler¹, Joanne Mulligan², Melinda Kirk^1
1Deakin University, ²Macquarie University

There is increasing criticism of STEM activities as often trivialising mathematics as merely a computational tool. This chapter describes the situating of mathematics in an interdisciplinary setting where practices of measure (area and height), sampling, variation and data modeling are interwoven with science concepts in ways that mutually reinforce learning. We demonstrate the effect of consecutive learning sequences in ecology (Grade 1), then fast plant growth (Grade 2), through a pedagogy that involves students’ invention, comparison/evaluation, and refinement of mathematical representations, with strong teacher guidance. The sequences were followed by several classes and their teachers, across two schools, with video capture, lesson observations, and tracking students’ representations in pre- and post-tests and student work samples. Teachers and case study students, across two schools, were interviewed at the end of each sequence. These sequences, and the findings, have much to say about productive inquiry-based mathematics pedagogy, and about the circumstances under which interdisciplinary practice can lead to robust mathematical learning of measure.

20th November 2020

I wonder why? Make Maths and Science come alive

Prof. Russell Tytler and Dr. Peta White

Exploring Maths through Science – learning while doing. Hands on activities that promote curiosity in learners to explore and understand the ‘why’.

Download presentation (coming soon)

STAVCON 2020: A Vision for the Future

https://stav.org.au/event/stavcon-2020/

Hosted by University of Wollongong Online Conference: June 23-26, 2020

Paper presentation

Planning interdisciplinary maths/science learning sequences for system impact

Authors

• Russell Tytler – Deakin University russell.tytler@deakin.edu.au 
• Peta White – Deakin University peta.white@deakin.edu.au

Team: Vaughan Prain, Lihua Xu, Joanne Mulligan, Richard Lehrer, Leona Schauble, Chris Nielsen, Melinda Kirk, Chris Speldewinde

There is increasing pressure on universities to demonstrate the wider impact of their research. As a science education community, we have an established interest in our research influencing teacher practice and beliefs. How can we package our research findings to inform and influence teachers, and systems?

This paper describes long-term design research leading to an interdisciplinary primary mathematics/science learning approach based on students constructing representations, consistent with core disciplinary practices. The particular task on which we are currently focused is that of translating the research findings into effective teacher resources. The paper describes the design stages leading to our current understandings of how to support teachers to adopt the approach with some fidelity. The stages are:

1. Long term development of research programs, working with dedicated teachers and tracking student learning, to generate key principles.
2. Widening the program to develop interdisciplinary mathematics/science learning sequences, curriculum-aligned, working across schools and teachers, year levels and topics.
3. Identifying key features of the pedagogy and challenges to teachers’ beliefs and practices that need to be addressed.
4. Codifying the approach, and sequence structures, to provide clarity on what is at stake, in ways attentive to teachers’ busy lives and competing interests.

Download presentation

Paper presentation

Exploring innovative pedagogies through interdisciplinary mathematics and science learning in the primary school

Authors

• Russell Tytler – Deakin University russell.tytler@deakin.edu.au
• Peta White – Deakin University peta.white@deakin.edu.au

Team: Vaughan Prain, Lihua Xu, Joanne Mulligan, Richard Lehrer, Leona Schauble, Chris Nielsen, Melinda Kirk, Chris Speldewinde

This paper describes the rationale and pedagogical approach of a 3-year longitudinal study designing and evaluating interdisciplinary mathematics and science learning sequences for Grades 1 through 6 across three schools (https://imslearning.org/). Topics included measuring height, ecology, astronomy, motion, light, flight, chemical science, water, fast plants, and microbiology. The pedagogy involves students’ construction and refinement of diagrammatic and textual representations and the development of measurement and data modelling, reflecting core disciplinary processes. A four-stage pedagogical model was employed:

1. Material engagement/observation/measurement: a stimulus and problem opens up generative learning opportunities through establishing a need to collect, interpret and represent data and/or construct explanatory representations of the phenomenon.
2. Representation challenge/invention: Students are challenged to invent/construct representations that reflect their measures, interpretations, and explanations.
3. Comparative review/sharing/evaluation: The teacher strategically guides sharing/display and comparison/evaluation of the representations.
4. Review/ refinement/application to new settings: Students refine or revise their representations, or respond to new and related challenges.

The paper draws on video data and interviews to illustrate each stage, and examine the variety of ways the model is enacted by different teachers in different topics. We report on the key elements of the pedagogy that effectively support learning in both science and mathematics.

Download presentation

Paper presentation

Multiple representations in student learning of optics: An interdisciplinary approach

Authors

• Lihua Xu, Deakin University, Geelong, lihua.xu@deakin.edu.au
• Christopher Speldewinde, Deakin University, Geelong, christopher.speldewinde@deakin.edu.au
• Vaughan Prain, Deakin University, Geelong, vaughan.prain@deakin.edu.au

There is a growing interest in the roles of multiple representations (MRs) in teaching science and of student generated representations (e.g. drawings) in facilitating student conceptual understanding in various science topics. This study examines intertextual and contextual meaning making afforded by multiple representations constructed by primary students in an optical unit over a ten-week period. The tasks in the sequence were designed to facilitate meaningful connections between concepts in science (e.g. reflection) and in mathematics (e.g. angles). The pedagogy involves students’ construction, refinement and evaluation of representations and models to describe and explain experienced phenomena. This presentation reports the analysis of student work generated from the sequence,  verbal accounts provided by the teacher and the students in interviews and video records of classroom interactions. The findings from this study demonstrate the value of this interdisciplinary approach in engaging students in core disciplinary practices in mathematics and science and in enabling them to make meaningful connections between these two curriculum areas.

Download presentation

Tytler, R., White, P., & Mulligan, J. (accepted). Visualisation and spatial thinking in primary students’ understandings of Astronomy. In O. Levrini, G. Tasquier, T. Amin, L. Branchetti, & M. Levin (Eds.). Selected papers from the ESERA conference 2019. Springer.

Abstract: Astronomy is commonly taught in primary schools, with an initial focus on explaining day and night, the solar system and seasons. However, there is abundant evidence that students going into secondary and even tertiary studies in astronomy have limited understanding and indeed misconceptions of astronomical phenomena. A core difficulty for students is the need, in visualizing/explaining astronomical phenomena, to coordinate earth and space centred perspectives and representations. This presentation will describe lesson sequences conducted in 3 schools, over 12 classes, focused on Grades 1 and 4 (Ages 6 and 10) children’s visualization of day and night from earth and space perspectives. The sequence is part of a project that links science with mathematics through representation construction and modeling as core approaches to learning. Key features of the sequence were children’s construction and coordination of spatial representations that linked the changes/movements in shadows (patterns) throughout the day with the movement of the sun in the sky and with earth’s rotation in relation to the sun to explain day and night, and the pedagogy employed by teachers to build on children’s representations to establish common understandings. The mathematics focus was on spatial reasoning including representations of length, rotation and angle, pattern representation, and temporal reasoning. Data included children’s artefacts, pre- and post-tests, field notes and video capture of key lessons, and student and teacher interviews. The pre- and post-test data and children’s interviews showed considerable shifts in children’s understanding of day and night and earth-sun relations. Analysis of the video data, and field notes, showed the complexity of concepts and spatial reasoning for children, and the power of a guided inquiry pedagogy involving the construction and comparison/evaluation of representations. The study provides fresh insights into the challenges presented in constructing flexible understandings of astronomical phenomena based on the coordination of spatial and temporal representations from different perspectives.

Our paper “Use Of Visual Representations In Astronomy Education: Issues, Affordances And Research Perspectives” has been accepted for presentation at the 2019 ESERA Conference.

Visualisation and spatial thinking in primary (elementary) students’ understandings of astronomy

Russell Tytler and Peta White (Deakin Univ.), Joanne Mulligan (Macquarie Univ.)

Astronomy is commonly taught in primary schools, with an initial focus on explaining day and night, the solar system and seasons. However, there is abundant evidence that students going into secondary and even tertiary studies in astronomy have limited understanding and indeed misconceptions of astronomical phenomena. A core difficulty for students is the need in visualising/explaining astronomical phenomena, to coordinate earth and space centred perspectives and representations. This presentation will describe lesson sequences conducted in 3 schools, over 12 classes, focused on Grades 1 and 4 (Ages 6 and 10) children’s visualisation of day and night from earth and space perspectives. The sequence is part of a project that links science with mathematics through representation construction and modeling as core approaches to learning. Key features of the sequence were children’s construction and coordination of spatial representations that linked the changes/movements in shadows (patterns) throughout the day with the movement of the sun in the sky and with earth’s rotation in relation to the sun to explain day and night, and the pedagogy employed by teachers to build on children’s representations to establish common understandings. The mathematics focus was on spatial reasoning including representations of length, rotation and angle, pattern representation, and temporal reasoning. Data included children’s artefacts, pre- and post-tests, field notes and video capture of key lessons, and student and teacher interviews. The pre- and post-test data and children’s interviews showed considerable shifts in children’s understanding of day and night and earth-sun relations. Analysis of the video data, and field notes, showed the complexity of concepts and spatial reasoning for children, as well as the power of a guided inquiry pedagogy involving the construction and comparison/evaluation of representations. The study provides fresh insights into the challenges presented in constructing flexible understandings of astronomical phenomena based on the coordination of spatial and temporal representations from different perspectives.

Keywords: Astronomy education, visualization and representation, modeling-based learning

Download Presentation

Introduction

Astronomy is taught across school year levels, from primary school foci on night and day and planetary features and exploration, to more complex considerations of moon phases, celestial movement, and cosmology in secondary schools. Yet, research has consistently shown a variety of misconceptions of a diverse range of phenomena such as earth-sun relations, seasons, lunar eclipses etc., despite repeated exposure to teaching. A major problem at each level is the coordination of earth bound perspectives on phenomena and space perspectives. This is essentially a problem of visualization and spatial reasoning involving coordination of different -earth-based and space-based representational systems.

Visualisation is increasingly recognized as central to conceptual learning across a range of sciences (Gilber, 2005), from learning to coordinate visual-spatial sub-micro particle arrangements to explain macro material properties, to the abstracted visualisations of forces and fields governing the movements of objects in space in physics. Underpinning all of these are systems of representation through which we visualize, and coordinate visual and spatial relations, such as diagrams, models and simulations of earth movements, and apparent movement of celestial objects. Thus, we argue that spatial reasoning and visualization through these representations is particularly important for learning challenging astronomy concepts (Hubber et al, 2017; Testa et al., 2017; Tytler et al. 2017).

We are currently engaged in a project exploring interdisciplinary approaches to science and mathematics teaching and learning in primary schools (Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science IMS: https://imslearning.org/ ), across a range of year levels and topics. The principle underpinning the project is that robust learning involves the invention, evaluation, refinement and coordination of representational systems in science and mathematics, and that through a serious focus on how these science and mathematics systems interrelate, more robust learning of foundational constructs will occur. Our past research indicates that deeper learning in both science and mathematics is achievable when students create and assess representations, make justified claims, and have first-hand experiences of the imaginative challenges and pleasures of these disciplinary processes. Creative and critical reasoning can be developed when students are embedded in contexts of guided inquiry, where they see their overarching learning purpose is to generate, revise, and critique knowledge through making and critiquing representations (Lehrer & Schauble, 2012; Prain & Tytler, 2012, Tytler et al., 2013). In visualizing, creating and analysing representations, data, models, and claims, students need to learn about the varied purposes and specific affordances of different disciplinary representations for imagining, reasoning and claim-making.

In this presentation we describe the planning and implementation of a primary school astronomy unit that focuses particularly on students constructing and coordinating representations to link the movement of shadows over the day, the sun’s position in the sky, night and day, and the rotation of the earth. We link the spatial reasoning processes involved in this work with fundamental reasoning through ideas developed as part of the mathematics curriculum, such as length, rotation and angle, time, and pattern recognition and representation.

Methodology

We worked with 12 teachers of grades 1-4 (ages 6-10) in 3 schools to plan and implement a sequence of 5 lessons focused on students understanding of the sun-earth relations with regard to shadows, daily solar movement, and night and day. Teachers implemented the sequence flexibly and collaboratively according to student needs. The pedagogy focused on children’s guided observations and construction of diagrammatic and textual representations, with class discussion helping children evaluate and refine representational work.

Students spent a day tracking their shadows on the asphalt using a chalk outline, linking this to the apparent movement of the sun in sky – rotation and angle, and linking the sun’s position with the position of the shadow. The changing length of shadows was tracked by a variety of means. A gnome was placed in the yard and it’s shadow traced on poster paper at regular intervals, giving a sense of the continuous change in length and directions. This could then be used in the classroom to model the change in the sun’s position using a torch, and to show how the same results could be had if the earth (poster paper) moved and the sun (torch) remained still. A presentation of the earth’s rotation using video animation was shown and children played with globes and torches to model their shadow results.

Data consisted of children’s productions, field notes and video capture of teaching and learning interactions including children’s collaborative discussion in selected classrooms, a pre- and post-test, and teacher and student interviews. The test included questions on the nature and cause of shadows, the movement of the sun in the sky, and the relation of the sun and earth to cause night and day. Children’s interview questions focused on their changing understandings, their interpretation of the representations, and their response to aspects of the learning sequence.

Findings

In the presentation we will provide examples of children’s work, transcripts and video evidence to illustrate:

• The pre-post test showed significant learning gains for the Grade 1 students in relation to shadow movement related to the sun, and earth rotation. The Grade 4 students had strong pre-test results so the growth was not as clear.
• From field notes and teacher interviews it was clear that children’s understanding of spatial relations between the sun’s movement and shadows required strong framing of embodied reasoning. Through measurement, mapping and embodied action , children achieved a confident sense of the spatial relation of shadow patterns to the sun’s movement across the sky.
• Teachers adapted the sequence to creatively work with models and embodied gestures in response to children’s learning needs.
• Children were confident to describe night and day as being caused by the earth’s rotation. For the Grade 1 children the link between shadows and the globe’s movement was difficult to comprehend, and there was considerable diversity in understandings. Grade 4 children were much more ready to apprehend these relations. A number of misconceptions and their spatial reasoning bases were revealed, that underpin common learning problems in astronomy.
• The challenge for children in coordinating the spatial relations was closely linked with constructs that form the basis of the mathematics curriculum, such as apprehending the change in length related to angle of sun in the sky, rotation of the shadow in relation to earth rotation, and envisaging the shadow position over time as a continuous function of the sun’s tracking.

Discussion and conclusion

This research showed the fundamental importance of students constructing, evaluating and coordinating multiple visual-spatial representations, including 2D drawings, 3D models and embodied gestures, to perceive the spatial relations underpinning earth sun relations relating to shadows, earth bound experience and space perspectives of day and night. It was clear that the representational challenge involved spatial reasoning practices/constructs associated with the mathematics curriculum; measuring, representing, coordinating and interpreting data about shadow length, and spatial reasoning about the change in angle of the sun. Pedagogically, the sequence demonstrated the effectiveness of a guided inquiry, representation construction/modeling approach, with longer term planning involving careful sequencing of representational moves, and short term strategies involving teacher response to student learning needs through embodied strategies and model manipulation. The research has provided fresh insight into the visual-spatial challenges for younger children in learning astronomy, and key strategies for constructing effective learning sequences.

References

Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization in science education. Springer, Dordrecht.

Hubber, P., & Tytler, R. (2017). Enacting a representation construction approach to teaching and learning astronomy. In D. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in Physics Education (pp. 139-161). London: Springer.

Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Sci Ed, 96(4), 701-724

Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Sci Ed, 96(4), 701-724

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751-2773.

Testa, I., Leccia, S., & Puddu, E. (2014). Astronomy textbook images: do they really help students?. Physics Education, 49(3), 332.

Tytler, R., Murcia, K., Hsiung, C-T., & Ramseger, J. (2017). Reasoning through representations. In M. Hackling, J. Ramseger, & H-L S. Chen (Eds), Quality Teaching in Primary Science Education: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 149-179). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44383-6_5

“Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science (IMS) Learning in the Primary School”

http://www.promaco.com.au/events/MERGA/

The Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Science (IMS) project* (https://imslearning.org/) is developing and investigating an approach to mathematics and science learning that implements learning sequences in which students’ invention and transformation of representational systems in the two subjects can support deeper learning in each. The guided inquiry pedagogy involves students in epistemic practices that approximate those in the discipline, such that concepts that sit at the intersection of the two disciplines (variation, sampling, symmetry, spatial reasoning) are approached from the distinct perspectives of each. The project is tracking students from Grades 1 to 5 from three school contexts longitudinally over 3 years to investigate conceptual and representational competence. Sequences include motion, ecology, astronomy, data modeling, graphing, variability, measurement and spatial reasoning. The presentation will include examples of the interdisciplinary approach, its affordances, and evidence of enhanced student learning.

Download presentation

Research Team: Russell Tytler (Deakin University), Joanne Mulligan (Macquarie University), Peta White, Lihua Xu, Vaughan Prain, Chris Nielsen, Melinda Kirk, Chris Speldewinde, (Deakin University), Richard Lehrer, Leona Schauble, (Vanderbilt University)

*Australian Research Council Discovery Grant No. DP180102333 Enriching mathematics and science learning: an interdisciplinary approach.

Elizabeth Quay image: Samuel Wiki

The Challenge of STEM

Russell Tytler talks to Education Matters about some of the recent innovations in the teaching and learning of STEM in the primary school years.

“Much of this focus is driven by concerns about wealth creation and global competitiveness. This is somewhat at odds, one might think, with the broader education agenda of personal growth in skills and dispositions, and citizenship, emphasised by the Melbourne Declaration. This concern to engage students in STEM pathways and improve the learning of STEM has increasingly extended into the primary school years, given growing evidence that orientations towards the STEM subjects and to STEM thinking working are largely established in the primary and early secondary school years.”

Read the full article at Education Matters.